This is the user forum of the DFT FLAPW code FLEUR.
It is meant to be used as a place to asks questions to other users and the developers, to provide feedback and suggestions.
The documentation of the code can be found at the FLEUR homepage.
[b][/b]
[i][/i]
[u][/u]
[code][/code]
[quote][/quote]
[spoiler][/spoiler]
[url][/url]
[img][/img]
[video][/video]
Smileys
smile
smile2
spook
alien
zunge
rose
shy
clown
devil
death
sick
heart
idee
frage
blush
mad
sad
wink
frown
crazy
grin
hmm
laugh
mund
oh
rolling_eyes
oh2
shocked
cool
[pre][/pre]
Farben
[rot][/rot]
[blau][/blau]
[gruen][/gruen]
[orange][/orange]
[lila][/lila]
[weiss][/weiss]
[schwarz][/schwarz]
sdub
Posts: 2 | Last online: 02.14.2022
Date registered
02.10.2022
Sex
not specified
    • sdub has written a new post "External electric field perpendicular to thin film" 02.11.2022

      Dear all,

      eventually, setting up a spin-polarized calculation solves the problem. I attach the resulting band-structure.
      The disadvantage of this approach is that I had to impose a spin-polarized occupation for the carbon atoms in the inp.xml. While self-consistency brings the system towards a non-magnetic solution, the final net magnetic moment is not exactly zero but of the order of 8x10-7...

      Parsing the output file, I still have one little question. Equal and opposite charges have been placed on the external sheets 1 and 2. Why does the code reports external electric fields of opposite magnitude on these two planes?

      ------------------------------------------------------------
      parameters for external electric field:
      total electronic charge = 12.00000
      total nuclear charge = 12.00000
      z-z1 of external sheet = 0.00000 a0 = 0.00000 A
      charge on external sheet 1 = 0.00500 (surface density= 0.00027 e/a.u.**2)
      external field on sheet 1 = -0.17264E+08 V/cm
      charge on external sheet 2 = -0.00500 (surface density= -0.00027 e/a.u.**2)
      external field on sheet 2 = 0.17264E+08 V/cm
      NOTE: The equation for the E field assumes two oppositely charged plates.
      You may need to divide by two before summing the external fields to avoid double counting
      ------------------------------------------------------------

      I guess that in this case, the actual field within the capacitor is of 0.17264E+08 V/cm, which is consistent with the computed band-structure. Is that right?

      Best regards,

      Simon

Recipient
sdub
Subject:


text:

Sign up, to leave a comment


Xobor Einfach ein eigenes Xobor Forum erstellen
Datenschutz